Tag Archives: Petermann

Ice Island Flotilla From Petermann Glacier Continue Southward Flow

More icebergs and ice island from Greenland are heading south along northern North-America this year. Petermann Glacier’s first piece arrived last year off Newfoundland causing a local tourist sensation for a stunning display of ice along its shores. There are many more pieces from Petermann to come for a few more years.

Track of Petermann Ice Island from Aug.-2010 through Aug.-2011 traveling in shallow water from northern Greenland along Baffin Island and Labrador to Newfoundland.

April 29/30, 2012 locations of Petermann Ice Island 2010 on their way south along northern North America. [Credit: Luc Desjardins, Canadian Ice Service]

Yet, how come that these arrivals are both so predictable in their pattern, but are almost impossible to pin down for an exact location and time? The answer involves mystical and fake forces, stunningly beautiful experiments, elegant mathematical equations, and, most important of all: spin.

The earth spins rapidly around its axis and neither ocean nor glaciers leave the planet for outer space. The obvious answer that gravity holds all the pieces in place is neither the correct nor the full answer. A subtle balance of several other forces makes Planet Earth the perfect place to keep us supplied with water to drink and air to breath. Additional forces besides gravity relate to the difference in pressure between the top and the bottom of the ocean as well as the rotational force that forces our car off the road if we speed too fast around a curve. The net effect of these is that earth fatter at the equator than at the North Pole. There appears to be more of gravity pulling us in at the North Pole than there is at the equator. Put another way, a scale measuring our own weight dips almost a pound more in Arctic Greenland than it does in the tropical forests of Borneo even if we do it naked in both places. Lose a pound of your weight instantly, travel to the far north. (GRACE)

This makes no sense intuitively, but common sense and intuition help little when it comes to how the ocean’s water and the atmosphere’s air move on a rotating planet. For example, we all know intuitively that a down-pour of rain flows down a slope into the ditch. It requires work to bring water up to the top of a hill or into the water towers to make sure that water flows when we open the faucet. Not true for the ocean at scales that relate to climate, weather, and changes of both. Here all water flows along, not down the hill. Better yet, it requires no work at all to keep it moving that way for all times. This is why Greenland’s ice keeps coming our way as soon as pieces break off. The earth’s spin makes it go around the hill, to speak loosely of pressure differences. Winds and friction have little effect. The ocean’s natural and usually stable state is in geostrophic balance. Geostrophy is a fancy word for saying that the ocean’s water flows along, not down a hill, because it is balanced by a fake and mystical Coriolis force that I will not explain. I teach a graduate class on Geophysical Fluid Dynamics for that.

In technical language, most of the oceans tend to flow along not down a pressure gradient. A kettle of boiling water discharges water from high pressure inside the kettle to the lower pressure in the kitchen. Yet the steam dissolved in the atmosphere moves around high or low-pressure systems. That’s how we read weather maps: Clockwise winds around high-pressure over Europe, North-America, and Asia to the north of the equator, counter-clockwise winds around low-pressure systems. If I apply this spin-law to Baffin Bay containing all the icebergs and ice islands, the spin rule states that these large and deep pieces flow along lines where the earth’s local rate of rotation, lets call it planetary spin f, divided by the local water depth, lets call it H, is a constant. So, to a first approximation, the icebergs and ice islands flow along a path where f/H is constant. If the planetary spin is constant, then the ice island follow lines of constant water depth H. There is more to the story, much more, such as the effects of waters of different densities residing next to each other, but I better continue this later, as I got a dinner date with a sweetheart and “Thermal Wind” can wait 😉

Ice Drift from Nares Strait to Newfoundland: The 1871 Polaris Expedition and Petermann Ice Islands

“Nineteen ship-wrecked members of the Polaris expedition of 1871-72
drifted on ice floes a distance of over 2500 km from Nares Strait near
79°N latitude to Newfoundland. Surviving this six months long ordeal,
they inadvertently mapped for the first time a drift of icy waters
from the Arctic to the North Atlantic Ocean. That they survived to
tell the tale is tribute to two Inuit, Joe Ebierbing and Hans Hendrik,
whose hunting skills and diligence provided food for the entire party
(Hendrik, 1878). Almost a century later, 1962-64, ice island WH-5 was
carefully tracked via ships and aircraft from north of Ellesmere
Island (83°N) to the Atlantic via Nares Strait (Nutt, 1966). The
movements of ice and water so revealed are one link in the global
hydrological cycle whose significance to global climate has yet to be
understood …” [from Muenchow et al. (2007)]

'Captain Hall's Arctic Expedition -- The "Polaris"'', a wood engraving published in ''Harper's Weekly'', May 1873.

The BBC contacted me this morning asking great questions related to the Petermann Ice Islands and icebergs. These reminded me of the opening paragraph quoted from a paper on the oceanography of Nares Strait. I published it in 2007 with two friends and fellow sailors of icy waters, Kelly Falkner and Humfrey Melling. In 2003 we sailed together on the US Coast Guard icebreaker Healy and making detailed measurements on ice, water,and bottom sediments. We reported strong southward currents from the Arctic Ocean into Baffin Bay opposing the local winds. Ocean currents were particular strong about 100 meters below the surface on the Canadian coast of Nares Strait. I am still working on these data as they relate to the flux of fresher Arctic waters into the Atlantic Ocean and their climate impacts.

There is history and drama in these places: Hall Basin is named after the leader of the Polaris Expedition, Charles Francis Hall, an American who was likely poisoned in 1871 with arsenic by his German Chief Scientist Dr. Emil Bessel aboard the Polaris beset in ice in Hall Basin. Bessel has a tiny fjord off Greenland named after him, it is located about 10 miles south of Petermann Fjord, named after August Heinrich Petermann, a German cartographer who traveled little himself but mapped much of what others had traveled. Joe Island, named after the Inuit hunter Joe Ebierbing of the Polaris ice drift, is the island that broke the 2010 Petermann Ice Island at the entrance of Petermann Fjord into PII-A and PII-B. The second Inuit hunter of the infamous 1872 drift, Hans Hendrick has Hans Island named after him which is very much in the center of Nares Strait and is currently claimed by both Canada and Denmark.

The Wikipedia entry on the Polaris Expedition has a well-written introduction while the book by Pierre Berton”The Arctic Grail”provides the story along with many other foolish and professional travails to reach the North Pole during the 19th and early 20th centuries.

Petermann Ice Island(s) 2010 through 2011, Part-1

An ice island 4 times the size of Manhattan spawned from a remote floating glacier in north-western Greenland the first week in August of 2010, but it quickly broke into at least 3-4 very large pieces as soon as it flowed freely and encountered smaller, but real and rocky islands. A beacon placed on the ice transmit its location several times every day. It shows a rapid transit from the frigid, ice-infested Arctic waters off Canada’s Ellesmere, Devon, and Baffin Islands to the balmier coasts of Labrador and Newfoundland:

Track of Petermann Ice Island from Aug.-2010 through Aug.-2011 traveling in shallow water from northern Greenland along Baffin Island and Labrador to Newfoundland.

Initial progress was slow as it took the new ice island almost 30 days to wiggle itself free of the narrow constraints of Petermann Fjord:

Petermann Glacier discharges its large ice island into Nares Strait on Aug.-30, 2010.

As soon as it left its home port, it hit broke hit tiny Joe Island on Sept.-9, 2010 and broke into two pieces, PII-A and PII-B for Petermann Ice Island A and B. Not a good start for a new island setting out to sail all the way to Newfoundland where PII-A arrived a year later, but I am getting ahead of my story.

Petermann Ice Island breaks into two segments on Sept.-9, 2010 as seen in this radar image provided by the European Space Agency. Greenland is at the bottom right, Canada top left, the Arctic Ocean is at the top right.

Once in Nares Strait both ice islands experienced a very strong and persistent ocean current. PII-A, about 1.5 the size of Manhattan went first followed by the larger (about 2.5 Manhattans) and thicker PII-B. Their tracks follow each other closely and they almost kiss on Oct.-8, 2010 when both are caught in the same eddy or meander of a prominent coastal current flowing south along Ellesmere and Devon Islands.

Pieces of Petermann Ice Island on Oct.-8, 2010 off southern Ellesmere Island about 600-km to the south of their origin. RadarSat imagery is courtesy of Luc Desjardins of the Canadian Ice Service, Government Canada.

Within a week the larger 136 km^2 piece PII-B breaks into three pieces of 93.5, 28.9, and 11.3 km^2 by Oct.-16 while PII-A stays largely intact at 73.6 km^2. These are all very large islands, the land area of Manhattan is about 60 km^2 for comparison. Some of these pieces approach the coast, some become grounded for a few days to a few weeks, some break off smaller pieces and spawn massive ice bergs that are not always visible from space. PII-A enters Lancaster Sound a week ahead of PII-B on Nov.-14, but exits it within 2 weeks:

Multiple pieces spawned from Petermann Ice Island as seen by RadarSat on Nov.-26 and Nov.-28, 2010 composited and anotated by Luc Desjardins of the Canadian Ice Service, Government Canada.

Notice also the evolution of a string of segments that Luc Desjardins of the Canadian Ice Service identified as pieces from Petermann Glacier. Glacier ice has a darker radar backscatter signature than the sea ice around it. All these pieces eventually enter the Baffin Island Current, a prominent large ocean current that extends from the surface to about 200-300 m depth. The Petermann pieces are moved mostly by ocean currents, not winds, because there is more drag on the submerged pieces of the 40-150 meter thick glacier ice. In contrast, the much thinner sea ice is mostly driven by the winds. This is also the reason one often finds areas in the lee of icebergs and islands free of older ice which is swept away by the winds as the iceberg moves slower as it is driven by deeper ocean currents. I will talk more of these in a later post.

As part of a large oceanography program in northern Baffin Bay and Nares Strait in 2003, we collected ocean temperature, salinity, chemistry, and current data along lines roughly perpendicular to both Baffin Island in the west and Greenland in the east along with the trajectory of PII-A in the fall of 2010 (red dots) and the almost identical track of a much smaller ice island from Petermann Glacier that passed the area in 2008:

Map of the study area with trajectory of a 2010 (red) and 2008 (grey) beacons deployed on Petermann Glacier ice islands over topography along with CTD station locations (circles) and thalweg (black line). Nares Strait is to the north of Smith Sound.

I will talk about these data and the subsequent tracks of PII-A and PII-B from 2010 into 2011 in Part-2 of this summary on how the first of this piece (PII-A) arrived off coastal Newfoundland in the late summer of 2011. Rest assured that there are many more pieces coming to coastal Labrador and Newfoundland in 2012 and 2013 where they put on a majestic display of abundant icebergs such as this last remnant of PII-A as seen from the air on Nov.-2, 2011 in Notre Dame Bay, Newfoundland.

Last surviving fragments of PII-A on Nov.-2, 2011 from a survey by air of southern Notre Dame Bay conducted by Canadian Ice Service, Government Canada..

Ocean Warming off Greenland near Petermann Glacier

Testifying before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming last year, I fumbled one question asked by the Honorable Chairman Edward J. Markey (D-MA): “Is it warming in the Petermann Glacier area?” I was unsure how the regionally relevant ocean temperatures had changed and how it impacts the melting glacier. A year late, we got the answer.

Floating ice shelf of Petermann Glacier on July 22, 2010 (NASA).

I was thinking of my former student Ms. Zweng. Three years earlier she had published a thorough analysis of ocean temperatures in Baffin Bay, that showed statistically significant warming by 0.11 +/- 0.06 degrees centigrade per decade for the 1916 through 2003 period (Zweng and Muenchow, 2006). But Baffin Bay is more than 800 miles away and it is not clear if those waters actually can make it to Petermann Fjord. I was also thinking of data in hand from only 80 miles away in Nares Strait whose waters definitely make it into Petermann, but I had not yet done the analyzes and thus did not know what the data would tell me. Now I do, and the peer-reviewed results (Muenchow et al., 2011) were published last week in Oceanography.

Time series of temperature (bottom) salinity (top) from the bottom of the ocean in Nares Strait between northern Greenland and Canada (from Muenchow et al, 2011). Trends are indicated for the 2003-06 and 2007-09 periods.

The data come from thermometers taking readings for years every 15 minutes. We placed the instruments on the bottom of the 300 meter deep ocean in 2003, recovered them in 2006, threw them back into the ocean in 2007 and found them again in 2009. We got data from three such instruments in 2003-06 and five in 2007-09 that all pretty much show the same thing: Bottom temperature change little during the 2003-06 period and about 0.06 +/- 0.02 degrees centigrade per year during the 2007-09 period of oberservations. Putting this together, we find a warming of 0.023 +/- 0.015 degrees centigrade per year. Next question would be, does this observed ocean warming in Nares Strait matter with regard to Petermann Glacier?

My current answer is a strong no. First, there is so much ocean heat already inside Petermann Fjord to melt away the entire floating section of the glacier (Johnson et al., 2011), that the extra ocean warming in recent years makes little difference. Second, the trends are from very short data sets that are dominated by physics unrelated to warming or could relate to a sequence of a few strong events that could either relate to man-made global warming or natural fluctuation at longer decadal cycles. This detection of signals in noise is a common problem in both engineering and geophysics, it is a required class for all our graduate students.

Very closely related is a paper entitled “Separating Signal and Noise in Atmospheric Temperature Changes: The Importance of Timescale” by Santer et al. (2011). Elegantly and comprehensively the authors expose and quantify the challenges one faces trying to extract the man-made warming signal from globally averaged near surface air temperature records sensed both from satellites and simulated in a number of numerical models. For this variable, the authors conclude convincingly, one needs records between 15-20 years long to extract a statistically significant man-made global warming signal from the much larger noise of natural variability.

So, if I had done my homework better last year, this should have been my answer to the question if it is warming in the Petermann Glacier area: “Yes, both the ocean and the atmosphere are warming in the Petermann region, but this may have little or no impact on the changing Petermann Glacier. Today we do not even know why Petermann Glacier has a floating ice shelf. Since we do not yet understand the physics of ice-ocean interactions, we can neither know nor predict what changes it has in store for us.”

Why Petermann Glacier and Fjord?

The National Science Foundation (NSF) declined to fund a Physical-Ocean-Ice-Shelf-Experiment (POISE) at Petermann Fjord in northern Greenland this year. The reviews by three anonymous peers, a panel of eight scientists, and two sympathetic program managers were all very good, but not without criticism.

Floating ice shelf of Petermann Glacier in August 2009 as seen from a helicopter of the Canadian Coast Guard Ship Henry Larsen. View is to the south-east with the glacier to the left and the ocean to the right. Photo by David Riedel, British Columbia.

Our admittedly expensive 4-year proposal was rejected along with at least five competing proposals in the same general subject area, because we did not show why a study of ice-ocean interaction of glaciers and ice-sheets has to take place at Petermann Glacier, a remote location less than 800 miles from the North Pole. Claiming this glacier to be unique, we made a fatal mistake, because NSF cares little about each glacier, but cares much about the underlying physical problem, that is, how do tidewater glaciers with floating ice shelves interact with the ocean they float on.

There are several glaciers in Greenland that have extensive ice shelves. To the best of my knowledge, they are all in northern Greenland. Nioghalvfjerdsfjorden and Petermann Fjord contain the largest floating areas exposed to the oceans on the east and west coasts of Greenland, respectively. Both these glaciers have seen preliminary studies during the last 15 years including radar measurements that describe the geometry of the ice shelves, the bedrock below, as well as the ice streams to connect the glaciers to the inland ice. Smaller and less studied glaciers with past or present ice shelves are Steensby, Ryder, and C.F. Ostenfeldt in the north-west as well as Academy and Marie-Sophie glaciers in the north-east (Weidick, 1995).

The most extensive ice shelves are located around Antarctica, however, and one thus may wonder, what uniform physics can and should be studied in northern Greenland that also applies to the ice sheets in the south? I would need some scaling law or normalization scheme that connects many glaciers into an organizational scheme. In physical oceanography the near-balance of a density-driven (internal) pressure gradient and the effects of a rotating earth provides a dynamical scale that connects river discharges off Delaware, with ice patterns off Eastern Greenland, and algae bloom patters off northern Norway, among many other phenomena. What dynamical metric connects the ice sheets of Greenland to each other and to those off Antarctica?