Not sure why, but this 1929 photo of two young scientists working off Greenland has been in my mind for the last 3 days. It shows a 23-year old graduate student of Anthropology from Columbia University, Frederica de Laguna, with one of her mentors, Archaeologist Dr. Therkel Mathiassen from Denmark. They were digging near Upernavik, Greenland for evidence of long-lost people living in north-west Greenland. It changed the life of Frederica de Laguna, the graduate student, as this summer in Greenland revealed the deep passion that she lived for 75 years after this photo was taken: Arctic Anthropology, the study of people, places, cultures. To me the photo shows an exuberant, yet relaxed and deep happiness after tiresome, yet immensely fulfilling work.
My strange obsession with Frederica de Laguna relates to convergent story lines that I am still trying to untangle. Her advisor at Columbia was Franz Boas who as a German physicist lived on southern Baffin Island during the First International Polar Year 1883/84 to study “everything” that he saw and experienced around Cumberland Sound which was a northern base for the whaling industry. His description of a massive iceberg is so detailed, that I feel comfortable to conclude, that he describes an ice island from Petermann Glacier about 1600 miles to the north. After his Arctic field work he emigrated to New York to become one of the founders of American Anthropology in the 20th century. Frederica de Laguna was one of his last graduate students, receiving her PhD in 1933 while digging in Alaska.
It took Frederica and her companion 18 days to sail from Copenhagen, Denmark to Upernavik, Greenland aboard the Hans Egede. Two of her sailing companions, a Dr. Krueger from Germany and his assistant Age Rose Bjare of Denmark were planing to explore the geology of Ellesmere Island and areas to the west of it in northern Canada and disappeared. In her autobiography she writes succinctly: “I don’t like Dr. Krueger. He thinks too much of himself.” This sentiment is also reflected by the Canadian police officer who described him as a “punk outfit and a badly overloaded sledge.” Her return sail she shared with Dr. Alfred Wegener, a German geophysicist and his group returning from initial explorations of Disko Bay, Greenland testing the first snowmobiles for a larger expedition to take place the following year in 1930. They probably provided one of the first descriptions of Jacobshavn Isbrae, a fast-moving Greenland outlet glacier. In 1929 it still had a substantial ice-shelf that disintegrated the last 15 years and is lost to history.
Alfred Wegener lost his life the following year when he tried to rescue companions who maintained a weather station on Greenland’s ice-sheet. His largest scientific contribution was the idea, that continents move, that North-America, Greenland, and Europe once connected, perhaps, and had drifted apart over the millenia. Since he did not have a physical mechanism detailed, it took oceanographers another 50 years to sort that part out, Wegner’s idea of continents adrift was ridiculed by the establishment at the time and eventually forgotten. It took another 30-40 years for it to revolutionize geology as a dynamic discipline. Plate tectonics is the standard now that explains earthquakes, vulcanoes, and much more. It perhaps did not help Dr. Wegner with the geologists like Dr. Krueger, that he was trained in physics, as was Dr. Boas, the advisor of the now renowned Arctic anthropologist Francisca de Laguna of Bryn Mawr College in Pennsylvania.
The observant reader will notice how many Germans are in this set of story lines. Franz Boas was Jewish and thrived,in the Americas, Hans Krueger was a pompous idiot who disappeared, and Alfred Wegener was a tragic hero. All were German scientists, all converged with Frederica de Laguna in 1929 just when she emerged as a powerful mind of her own as a young graduate student in a field dominated by men. When Germany invaded Poland and France 10 years later, Dr. Frederica de Laguna was teaching her passions at Bryn Mawr College outside Philadelphia. When the war came to America, she asked for a leave of absence to serve in Naval Intelligence where she became a Lieutenant Commander. Her superiors at Bryn Mawr considered this a waste of her time, but she disagreed, and so do I. It is the many personal choices we make, both small and large, that form our personal histories, our science, our selves, and the larger history that we all live … [to be continued]
Davis, R. (2006). Frederica de Laguna of Bryn Mawr College Arctic Anthropology, 43 (2), 21-27 DOI: 10.1353/arc.2011.0075
VanStone, J., & de Laguna, F. (1980). Voyage to Greenland: A Personal Initiation into Anthropology Ethnohistory, 27 (2) DOI: 10.2307/481234
have been traveling to Upernavik since 1992
Why is Dr. Krüger an idiot? Have you met him?
I have not met Dr. Krueger, but his actions and opinions as recorded by Dr. de Laguna and Canadian Police indicate to me, that he refused to accept experiences of others whom he considered of a lesser rank such as the American graduate student Frederica de Laguna and an Arctic policeman. For this ignorance he vanished into the Canadian Arctic to be never seen again.
Dr. de Laguna was just a young and an unexperienced student at the time she met him. Not sure if her opinion is relevant. We all have never met Krueger or worked together with him. Maybe he was an idiot maybe not. We will never know. But in any case it’s not fair to discredit him in your way!
I respectfully disagree. Even the young and inexperienced student Frederica de Laguna was more experienced working around Greenland with a diverse set of people than the older and more established Dr. Krueger had at the time. Furthermore, the values Dr. de Laguna lived throughout her rich and long life demonstrate that she was an outstanding judge of character endorsing diversity and a democratic spirit which certainly cannot be said of Dr. Krueger. He vanished into obscurity precisely because he disregarded advice of those whom he considered of “lower rank” such as female graduate student or a Canadian Policeman. The policeman stationed and experienced for many years in the Arctic described Dr. Krueger as “punk outfit” not fit for survival in the harsh Arctic. We know for sure that he was right.
We know for sure that Krueger’s companions disappeard too. Were they pompous idiots too? Btw. it was Krueger’s second trip to Greenland and Boas had a very strange relationship to his lower-class “Diener” too! So many inuit died in the arctic. Were they not fit for survival? Your arguments seems to me on “toenernen Fuessen”! You should read other reports about Krueger’s expedition too. Nobody blamed Krueger for being a fool. With all respect!
My “argument” is a personal judgement call. Three Germans converged on that 1929 Greenland voyage: Alfred Wegener, Franz Boas (via his graduate student Frederika de Laguna), and Hans Krueger. To me these three represent three very different segments of German society. Wegener was a creative and revolutionary scientist crossing disciplinary boundaries (meteorology, glaciology, geology), Boas emigrated to the USA where he put the study of people and culture (anthropology) onto a solid quantitative footing, while Krueger was a traditional geologist who on many occasions ignored sage advice from people whom, I speculate, he regarded as inferior.
My sources are De Laguna (1977, Voyage to Greenland), Dick (2001, Muskox Land), Barr (1993, The career and disappearance of Hans Krueger, Arctic geologist), as well as Park and Stanton (2007, A Hans Krueger Arctic Expedition cache on Axel Helberg Island, Nunavut). What are your sources that I should read?
Pingback: The Ice Shelf of Petermann Gletscher, North Greenland and its ocean below: Introductions | Icy Seas
Here is an interesting article reg Krueger: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7874043&fileId=S0032247409990428